When we think about water conservation, our minds often go to the familiar advice: take shorter showers, turn off the tap while brushing our teeth, and reuse hotel towels. These personal actions are undoubtedly important and form the bedrock of a water-conscious mindset. They represent our direct, visible relationship with water.
However, a system-thinking approach to global water use reveals a web of hidden interconnections and feedback loops. The most significant impacts on our planet's freshwater resources—and the greatest opportunities for meaningful change—are often hidden from view. They lie embedded in our global supply chains, on our dinner plates, and within the very definitions we use to measure efficiency. This article delves into recent global research to uncover five of the most impactful truths about water that challenge our common assumptions and redefine what it means to be a true water steward.
The distinction between direct and indirect water use is critical to understanding our real impact. Direct use is the water that flows from our taps. Indirect, or "virtual," water is the water consumed to produce the goods and services we use every day, and this is where the vast majority of our water footprint lies, especially in what we eat. Research into the Travel & Tourism sector highlights this imbalance. A study in Valencia found that a staggering 84% of the sector's water footprint was from the indirect consumption related to goods and services. Only 16% was used directly by tourists. A deeper look reveals that food and agriculture alone account for nearly three-quarters of the entire sector's water use.
While hotels often focus their conservation messaging on guest bathrooms, the data reveals this is a misdirection of focus; guest rooms are responsible for only a third of a hotel's water consumption. This insight comes from the Hotel Water Measurement Initiative (HWMI), a groundbreaking methodology in the hospitality industry, which found that a hotel’s on-site water use is typically split into a surprising ratio. While one-third of a hotel's total water consumption is attributed to guest rooms, the remaining two-thirds are used for "all other uses." This is a broad category that includes water-intensive kitchens (tying directly to the food footprint), laundries, swimming pools, and irrigation for landscaping. If a hotel outsources its laundry services, the water use is still significant, with the HWMI estimating it takes 20,000 liters of water to wash just one tonne of laundry. This reveals that a hotel's most significant water savings are not achieved through guest persuasion, but through operational excellence and capital investment in its unseen, water-intensive infrastructure.
The common perception of "wasted" irrigation water seeping into the ground is a fundamental misunderstanding; much of this water is not lost but is a vital part of the basin-level water cycle. Water resource experts make a critical distinction between "consumed" water (removed from the system via evaporation or transpiration by the crop) and "non-consumed" water. A significant portion of this non-consumed water becomes "recoverable return flow." It is not truly lost. Instead, it percolates down to recharge freshwater aquifers or flows back into drains and rivers, where it becomes available for downstream users. For this reason, organizations like the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations prefer the term "water requirement ratio" over "irrigation efficiency," as the latter misleadingly implies the non-consumed portion is permanently wasted. This holistic, basin-level perspective is critical, because it sets the stage for understanding why the specific location of water use is the most important variable of all. This requires a fundamental shift in water governance, moving from farm-level efficiency metrics to integrated basin-level management that accounts for the complex feedback loops between upstream use and downstream availability.
The most fundamental error in water accounting is assuming a liter of water has the same value everywhere; its true impact is dictated entirely by the local context of scarcity. Using a cubic meter of water in a water-scarce region like Tunisia has a far greater ecological impact than using the same amount in a water-abundant area. The Destination Water Risk Index (DWRI) identifies regions where industries like hospitality face "very high" water-related risks. These hotspots are concentrated in regions like the Asia Pacific and the Middle East and Africa, with specific destinations such as Delhi and the Maldives facing extreme stress. This gives rise to the "scarcity-weighted water footprint." This insight transforms water management from a volumetric accounting exercise into a strategic, risk-based allocation of resources, demanding that conservation efforts be concentrated in scarcity hotspots where they deliver the highest impact.
The narrative that tourism universally strains local water resources is compelling but incomplete; in some developed nations, tourists are surprisingly more water-efficient than the residents themselves. Data from several regions supports the common view; in certain Asian countries, a tourist can use between 1.5 and 8 times more water per day than a local. In India, visitors consume approximately 7 times more than the average domestic user. However, in a counter-intuitive twist, the situation is reversed in some European countries. In the UK and Spain, for example, a tourist on average uses only about half as much water as a local resident. This paradox dismantles the simplistic narrative of the "water-guzzling tourist," forcing a more nuanced analysis that considers local consumption norms, infrastructure efficiency, and economic context to understand tourism's true net impact on a water basin.
In this model, the CEO’s primary job is not just to formulate the top-level plan, but to execute the entire strategic process. This requires designing and overseeing the system through which choices are made at every level. As Verizon executive Andres Irlando brilliantly redefined it:
"Wouldn’t you call execution the act of setting up that series of choice cascades, identifying the manager responsible for the choices in each cascade, and following up to ensure that they make the choices for which they are responsible?"
This profound mindset shift places the responsibility for any "strategy-execution gap" squarely with top leadership. It is not a failure of those "below" them, but a failure to effectively orchestrate the cascade of choices that brings a strategy to life.
Our common sense about water conservation—rooted in the visible flow from our taps—is an important starting point, but it isn't the full story. A systems-thinking approach reveals a hidden world of virtual water flows, basin-level dynamics, and high-impact leverage points that are far more consequential. From the food on our plates to the complex operations of a hotel, the greatest water challenges are deeply embedded in the structure of our global economy. These surprising truths do not diminish the value of personal conservation efforts, but they enrich our understanding and empower us to ask more impactful questions. If the water we don't see is what matters most, how must we redesign our supply chains, our cities, and our own consumption patterns to align with this hidden reality?
For support in setting up water efficiency systems for your properties or for training needs, please contact us at info@tscconsulting.co.
References
Alhudaithi, A., Arregui, J., & Cobacho, R. (2024). Proposal of a water consumption efficiency indicator for the hospitality sector. Journal of Water Resources Management, 38(12), 4721–4739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03812-5
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (n.d.). Irrigation water use and water requirement ratio. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/faowater/docs/WR_37_web.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (n.d.). Green the Economy with Agriculture: Water Efficiency Metrics. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/4/i2745e/i2745e00.pdf
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance. (n.d.). Hotel Water Measurement Initiative (HWMI). Retrieved from https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/resource/hotel-water-measurement-initiative
Sustainable Hospitality Alliance. (n.d.). Destination Water Risk Index (DWRI) report. Retrieved from https://sustainablehospitalityalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/DWRI-report.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Water Safety Plan Manual: Step-by-step risk management for drinking-water suppliers. Geneva: WHO.
ISO. (2019). ISO 46001:2019 – Water efficiency management systems – Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization.
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011
Vir, S. (2019). Aquastat questionnaire 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
DWACT. (2016). Water risk assessment in tourism and hospitality.
Achieving Behaviour Change. (2025). Behavioural strategies for water efficiency.
Here is our Quick Bite Training: